Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has taken a decisive step in response to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling mandating the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) for all serving teachers in non-minority institutions. On September 15, 2025, the Chief Minister directed the Basic Education Department to file a review petition challenging the verdict, which has triggered widespread concern among educators across the state.
The Supreme Court’s order, issued on September 1, 2025, requires all in-service teachers—regardless of their years of experience or prior appointments—to clear the TET within two years to remain eligible for service and promotions. Teachers with less than five years of service left are exempt from the test but will not be eligible for advancement. The ruling has placed nearly 2 lakh teachers in Uttar Pradesh at risk of compulsory retirement, prompting urgent action from the state government.
CM Yogi’s Directive: Protecting Experience and Service
In a post shared by the Chief Minister’s Office on X, CM Yogi stated:
“The state’s teachers are experienced and have been provided training from time to time by the government. Ignoring their qualifications and years of service is not justified.”
He emphasized that the government recognizes the value of long-serving educators and will pursue legal remedies to protect their careers. The review petition is expected to argue that retrospective application of the TET requirement undermines the professional contributions of teachers appointed before the test was introduced in 2011.
Supreme Court’s TET Mandate: Key Highlights
| Provision | Details |
|---|---|
| Applicability | All serving teachers in non-minority institutions |
| Exemption | Teachers with less than 5 years of service left |
| Compliance Timeline | Must clear TET within 2 years |
| Promotion Eligibility | TET mandatory for career advancement |
| Objective | Standardize teaching quality across India |
The ruling was delivered by a bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan, in response to appeals including the Anjuman Ishat-E-Talim Trust vs. State of Maharashtra case.
Impact on Uttar Pradesh’s Teaching Community
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Teachers Affected | ~2 lakh |
| Teachers Appointed Pre-2011 | Majority of affected group |
| Districts with Protests | Prayagraj, Basti, Hamirpur, Mahoba |
| Teacher Suicides Reported | 2 (as per family claims) |
| Unions Supporting Review | UP Primary Teachers Association, All India Primary Teachers’ Federation |
The ruling has sparked protests and demonstrations across the state, with educators demanding recognition of their experience and training. Teacher unions have welcomed CM Yogi’s move, calling it a “step in the right direction.”
Government’s Legal Strategy and Alternatives
| Action Plan | Status |
|---|---|
| Review Petition Preparation | Underway |
| Legal Grounds | Retrospective application, violation of service rights |
| Alternative Proposal | Specialized training modules for non-TET teachers |
| Coordination with NCTE | Request for clarification on exemptions |
The Basic Education Department is expected to highlight the adverse effects of the ruling on teacher morale, retention, and rural education delivery. The government may also propose a phased compliance model or alternative certification pathways.
National Implications: A Precedent in the Making
Uttar Pradesh is the first state to legally challenge the Supreme Court’s TET mandate. Education experts believe the outcome of the review petition could set a precedent for other states facing similar concerns.
| State-Level Impact | Potential Outcome |
|---|---|
| States with Pre-TET Appointments | May seek exemptions |
| Minority Institutions | Already exempt under current ruling |
| Central Government Response | Awaited |
| Policy Revisions | Possible amendments to RTE Act, 2009 |
The case has reignited debate on balancing standardized qualifications with experiential learning and service-based recognition.
Teacher Voices: Ground-Level Sentiment
| Teacher Profile | Quote |
|---|---|
| Rajesh Kumar, Basti | “I’ve taught for 22 years. Asking me to clear TET now feels like an insult.” |
| Meena Sharma, Prayagraj | “We’ve undergone multiple government trainings. Why is that not enough?” |
| Anil Verma, Mahoba | “The ruling has created panic. We need clarity and compassion.” |
Many teachers argue that the sudden imposition of TET disregards their years of service and the government’s own training programs.
Education Experts Weigh In
| Expert Name | Opinion |
|---|---|
| Prof. R. K. Singh, BHU | “Standardization is important, but not at the cost of experience.” |
| Dr. Anjali Mehta, NCERT | “A hybrid model of certification and service evaluation may be more effective.” |
| Prof. S. K. Mishra, DU | “The review petition is justified. Blanket rules don’t work in education.” |
Experts suggest that the government should explore inclusive frameworks that uphold quality without penalizing long-serving educators.
Conclusion: CM Yogi’s Legal Push Reflects Commitment to Teachers
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s decision to file a review petition in the Supreme Court marks a pivotal moment in India’s education policy discourse. By challenging the mandatory TET requirement for serving teachers, the Uttar Pradesh government is advocating for a more nuanced approach that values experience, training, and service.
As the legal process unfolds, the outcome will not only affect lakhs of teachers in Uttar Pradesh but also shape national conversations on educational standards, teacher welfare, and policy implementation.
—
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available news reports, official statements, and verified government sources. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or political advice. All details are subject to change based on judicial proceedings and policy updates.
