‘Have Some Shame’: Ajit Pawar’s Old Video Questioning Post-Death Political Rush Surfaces After Sunetra Pawar Becomes Deputy CM

Sunetra Pawar

A resurfaced video of Ajit Pawar, where he once criticized the political rush that follows a leader’s death, has gone viral after his wife Sunetra Pawar was sworn in as Deputy Chief Minister of Maharashtra. The video, in which Ajit Pawar is heard saying “Have some shame” while questioning opportunistic politics after a leader’s demise, has triggered widespread debate and political reactions across the state.


The Viral Video

The video dates back several years, when Ajit Pawar was addressing a gathering and criticized the tendency of political parties to rush for positions immediately after the death of a leader. His remarks were aimed at highlighting the insensitivity of such moves, urging politicians to respect the grieving period.

Key highlights of the video:

  • Ajit Pawar condemned the practice of rushing for power after a leader’s death.
  • He used strong words like “Have some shame” to emphasize his point.
  • The clip has resurfaced now, drawing attention due to Sunetra Pawar’s elevation.

Sunetra Pawar’s Appointment

Sunetra Pawar’s swearing-in as Deputy CM has been seen as a significant development in Maharashtra politics. Her appointment consolidates the Pawar family’s influence and strengthens Ajit Pawar’s faction within the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP).

AspectCurrent StatusImpact
PositionDeputy CM of MaharashtraExpands Pawar family’s political footprint
TimingPost internal NCP riftSparks debate on dynastic politics
Public ReactionMixedSupporters hail continuity, critics raise questions
Opposition ViewAllegations of opportunismFuels political controversy

Political Reactions

The resurfaced video has given opposition parties fresh ammunition:

  • Congress and Shiv Sena (UBT): Criticized Ajit Pawar for hypocrisy, pointing to his past remarks.
  • BJP Allies: Downplayed the controversy, focusing on governance stability.
  • Civil Society Voices: Questioned the ethics of dynastic politics and opportunistic appointments.

Public Sentiment

Public opinion remains divided:

  • Supporters of Ajit Pawar: Argue that Sunetra’s appointment ensures continuity and stability.
  • Critics: Highlight the contradiction between Ajit Pawar’s old remarks and current developments.
  • Neutral Citizens: Concerned about whether governance will remain effective amid political controversies.

Comparative Analysis of Dynastic Politics in Maharashtra

FamilyKey LeadersStrategyPublic Perception
PawarAjit, Sunetra, ParthConsolidation through family rolesMixed reactions
ThackerayUddhav, AadityaOpposition narrativeStrong loyal base
ShindeEknath ShindeAlliance with BJPCurrent CM position
FadnavisDevendra FadnavisBJP leadershipSeen as merit-based

This comparison shows how dynastic politics continues to shape Maharashtra’s governance.


Implications for Maharashtra Politics

The controversy could have several implications:

  • Intensify debates on dynastic politics.
  • Strengthen Ajit Pawar’s faction within the NCP.
  • Influence voter sentiment ahead of upcoming elections.
  • Provide opposition parties with a narrative to challenge the ruling coalition.

Conclusion

The headline “’Have Some Shame’: Ajit Pawar’s Old Video Questioning Post-Death Political Rush Surfaces After Sunetra Pawar Becomes Deputy CM” reflects the irony and controversy surrounding current developments in Maharashtra. While Sunetra Pawar’s appointment consolidates the Pawar family’s influence, the resurfaced video has reignited debates about opportunism and dynastic politics.

As Maharashtra heads into crucial political contests, the balance between governance, family influence, and public perception will play a decisive role in shaping the state’s future.


Disclaimer

This article is intended for informational and analytical purposes only. It reflects current political developments and perspectives within Maharashtra. The content does not represent official statements from Ajit Pawar, Sunetra Pawar, the NCP, or any political party. Readers should verify facts through authoritative sources before drawing conclusions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *