The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a plea challenging the Z-plus security cover provided to Mukesh Ambani and his family, stating that threat perception is determined by government agencies, not the judiciary.
Court’s Strong Rebuttal
A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan pulled up petitioner Bikash Saha for repeatedly filing pleas on the same issue, warning that frivolous litigation will not be entertained. The court emphasized that security decisions are based on intelligence inputs and cannot be arbitrarily revoked.
Government’s Stand on Security Cover
The Union and Maharashtra governments had earlier clarified that the Ambani family’s security cover was granted after a thorough assessment of potential threats. The Supreme Court upheld this stance, stating that the petitioner lacked legal standing to challenge the security arrangement.
Legal Precedents & Future Implications
The court reiterated its February 2023 ruling, which directed that Z-plus security for Mukesh Ambani and his family would continue, with the cost borne by the industrialist himself. It also warned that future attempts to challenge the security cover could result in penalties.
For more updates on legal developments and national security, stay tuned! 🚀
